KE
KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered modest sequential improvement: revenue rose 3.2% to $159.0M with Adjusted EBITDA up 34% to $18.5M (11.6% margin), aided by stronger completions/production activity and cost controls; GAAP diluted EPS was $(1.04) and Adjusted diluted EPS was $(0.88) .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, KLX missed on revenue ($159.0M vs $163.5M*) and Adjusted EPS ($(0.88) vs $(0.62)); S&P’s standardized EBITDA also came in below consensus ($15.0M actual vs $21.8M* est.), reflecting definitional differences vs company “Adjusted EBITDA” .
- Management guided Q3 to be the strongest quarter of 2025 with low-to-mid single-digit sequential revenue growth and continued margin expansion; Rocky Mountains and Northeast/Mid-Con momentum offset softer Permian “white space” in Q2 and should continue improving into Q3 .
- Liquidity improved to $65.4M (cash $16.7M + $48.7M ABL availability) and levered FCF was $8.0M, supporting balance sheet flexibility as management balances cash vs PIK interest and curtails 2H25 capex within a $40–$50M gross/$30–$40M net FY guide .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Sequential execution ahead of a weaker macro: revenue +3.2% and Adjusted EBITDA margin +260 bps to 11.6% despite US land rig count down ~7% q/q; CEO: “Adjusted EBITDA margin increased by 260 basis points… despite the US land rig count being down (7.3)% sequentially” .
- Segment rebound outside the Permian: Rockies revenue +13% q/q with Adjusted EBITDA +55% on higher utilization; Northeast/Mid-Con revenue +12% q/q with Adjusted EBITDA +167% as white space eased .
- Cost discipline and SG&A efficiency: Q2 SG&A $18.0M; CFO noted adjusted SG&A would be ~$15.1M, 12% below prior-year Q2 and 8% below Q1, with adjusted SG&A expected at 9–10% of revenue for 2025 .
-
What Went Wrong
- Permian-driven softness: Southwest revenue fell (9.8)% q/q; segment turned to an operating loss with Adjusted EBITDA down (38.5)% on completion holidays and mix/white space .
- Interest burden and losses: Interest expense of $11.0M drove a GAAP net loss of $(19.9)M (net loss margin (12.5)%), though improved vs Q1; management actively toggled PIK vs cash interest to manage liquidity .
- Consensus shortfall: Single-analyst S&P consensus implied revenue and EPS above actuals; standardized EBITDA also trailed consensus, highlighting either conservatism or definition mismatch vs company Adjusted EBITDA [GetEstimates – S&P Global, see table note].
Financial Results
Q2 2025 vs prior year and prior quarter (oldest → newest):
Q2 2025 actual vs S&P Global consensus:
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Notes: Company reported “Adjusted EBITDA” of $18.5M; S&P’s standardized EBITDA actual differs at $15.0M (definition variance). The press release headline rounds Adjusted EBITDA to “$19 million” while details show $18.5M .
Segment revenue and Adjusted EBITDA (oldest → newest):
KPIs and cash flow (oldest → newest):
Guidance Changes
Note: No quantitative revenue/EPS ranges were provided; guidance remains directional.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We continued to focus on the execution of our operational initiatives, including cost management, asset rotation, holding the line on pricing, and leaning into higher-margin work … we expect the third quarter to be the strongest quarter of the year … targeting a sequential quarterly revenue increase of low to mid-single digits … with continued margin expansion.” — CEO Chris Baker .
- “Consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $18.5 million with a 12% margin… adjusted SG&A would have been $15.1 million… We ended Q2 with approximately $65 million in liquidity.” — CFO Keefer Lehner .
- “Our Haynesville plus Northeast revenue increased about 25% quarter over quarter … we’re still 40% off the gas-driven quarterly revenue highs we saw in 2023, illustrating ample room to run.” — CEO .
- “We elected to pay a portion of Q3 interest in cash … we will evaluate future PIK versus cash pay decisions based on market conditions and company leverage and liquidity.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Hitting Q3 growth amid falling rig count: Management cited strong exit rates in May/June, restarted completion programs, and base-loaded schedules across Q3; risks remain from unplanned “white space” .
- Gas basin outlook: Rigs/crews adding in Haynesville; NE stable; Q2 gas revenue +25% q/q; still well below 2023 highs, implying runway if gas macro tightens .
- Cash flow and capex cadence: Expect Q3 working capital to be more intensive (three July payrolls, revenue uplift) with some unwind in Q4; 2H capex curtailed, with higher spend in Q3 vs Q4 .
- M&A environment: More deal “capitulation” among smaller OFS; majors’ HSE/SOP standards create barriers; KLX ready to act on deleveraging, creative transactions within debt docs .
- HSE/SOP enforcement: Step-change among majors; consistency and procedures increasingly critical in pressure-related service lines (coil tubing, frac) .
Estimates Context
- Coverage is limited (one estimate for revenue and EPS in Q2), and KLX missed S&P consensus on revenue ($159.0M vs $163.5M*) and Adjusted EPS ($(0.88) vs $(0.62)); S&P standardized EBITDA actual ($15.0M) also below consensus ($21.8M*) while company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was $18.5M .
- Street models may need to reduce Southwest assumptions given extended Permian completion holidays and mix/white space, partially offset by higher Rockies and Northeast/Mid-Con utilization and Q3 seasonality uplift .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Operations outperformed a weak macro sequentially; however, Q2 was a small miss vs limited consensus and losses persist—focus shifts to Q3 execution, which management says will be the strongest quarter with further margin expansion .
- Permian remains the swing factor: continued “white space” risks could cap upside; watch for evidence of sustained activity resumption and mix normalization in Southwest .
- Gas leverage is building: Haynesville and Northeast improved meaningfully; further gas price/LNG tailwinds could drive additional utilization and pricing in 2H25/2026 .
- Balance sheet flexibility improved: $65.4M liquidity, positive Q2 FCF, and optionality to toggle PIK vs cash interest; 2H25 capex curtailed, which should support liquidity into year-end .
- Monitor SG&A discipline and segment margin trajectory—adjusted SG&A run-rate of ~9–10% of revenue and rising Rockies/Northeast margins should underpin incremental operating leverage in Q3 .
- Corporate development is a potential catalyst: management sees rising M&A dialogue and possible consolidation that could be deleveraging—timing/valuation remain constraints .
- Stock reaction likely hinges on Q3 delivery vs this directional guide and visibility into Permian recovery vs gas-driven upside; any quantitative guide would reduce uncertainty and help re-rate expectations .
Appendix: Additional Detail and Cross-Checks
- Product line mix in Q2: drilling 16%, completion 56%, production 18%, intervention 10% .
- Liquidity detail: cash $16.7M and ABL availability $48.7M (incl. undrawn FILO) at 6/30/25 .
- Non-GAAP reconciliation: one-time costs of $2.9M; Adjusted Net Loss $(17.0)M; Adjusted diluted loss/share $(0.88) .
- Conference logistics and release timing (Q2): PR on Aug 6; call on Aug 7 .